Once or twice a year, just to confuse us, Her Honor applies the “hearsay“ concept correctly. But then it’s back to normal for another six months.
In one especially priceless episode, she snapped “Don’t tell me what you said to him”—and only just caught herself before going on to say that, presumably, that would be hearsay.
Do not waste your time bringing out a map to demonstrate that Vancouver, Washington is a suburb of Portland, Oregon. If it sounds as if it’s next to Canada, it is next to Canada.
If your case goes to trial, it doesn’t matter if the jury finds you not guilty by a unanimous vote after five minutes’ token discussion. “Not guilty” doesn’t mean innocent. It just means the DA couldn’t prove it. If you hadn’t been guilty as sin, you would never have been arraigned.
Count how many times Her Honor has said “If you interrupt again, I’m dismissing your case.” Count how many times she has actually done it.
Human memory is linear. Your recollection of past events is always clearest immediately after the event.
Bailment? What’s that?
This remains true, no matter how often it is demonstrated to be untrue.
Look it up. The lender will almost certainly require full coverage. The law doesn’t care.
Do not waste your time trying to explain the concept of a pre-emptively suspended drivers’ license. Do not waste your time trying to explain that thirty days’ notice is mandated by state law, so there was no need to put it in the contract. Do not waste your time trying to explain the concept of an “unmarked crosswalk at an intersection” as defined in most states’ vehicle codes.
My favorite to date: In a case involving damage to a valuable bicycle, Her Honor turns to her bailiff and asks what is the most expensive bike he has ever seen. Clearly he is expected to say something like $500. Instead he says $10,000, supplying helpfully “It was baaad”. I wonder if the plaintiff realizes how lucky he was.
A witness who looks the judge in the eye is telling the truth. A witness who is telling the truth looks the judge in the eye. This remains true even after it has been demonstrated to be untrue.
Thank Heaven for that bailiff, or Her Honor would still be jumping on black witnesses every time they use the word “stay” to mean “dwell” or “abide”.
Guess where the difference is significant. When the criminal case is followed by a civil case. Like the one you’re watching on TV right now.
If they tried, the judge would speedily detect the fraud and put a stop to it.
Fortunately your average TV litigant does not know this, or Her Honor‘s follicle-testing lab would be out of business.
Makes you wonder about Her Honor’s parenting skills, doesn’t it?
Hammurabi? Never heard of the guy.
Fiction is always stranger than truth.
Drat! There go several thousand attorneys’ paychecks.
Need I spell it out? If the defense against a charge of first-degree murder is different from the defense against a charge of manslaughter, then obviously the defense against a $750 damage claim must be different from that against a $600 claim for the same damage.
|
Rats Paintings MiSTings and More eBooks Games |
MiSTing of “Coming Home hints” MiSTing of “Alonzo and Melissa” Why I Like Rats Know Your Lion Judge Judy The Panda Page |
Questions? Comments? Write me at lucy2424 at sbcglobal dot net.